AngiePen ([info]angiepen) wrote,
@ 2007-05-14 23:12:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Entry tags:fandom, issues, writing

Browsing the FanLib TOS
Just to add my two cents' worth to the rumbling about FanLib.com....

[info]stewardess had a good idea about protecting our names so I'm in the process of signing up for an account, just so no one else can grab "AngiePen" and post crap in my name. Ignoring for a moment the ridiculously lame search functions and other coding and organizational issues which a commercial set-up should be able to afford to do at least as well as any free fan-run site, let's take a look at the TOS. (All bolding mine.)

Certain information about You is subject to our Privacy Policy. For more information, see our full privacy policy at [edited to remove link.] Notwithstanding the foregoing, FanLib reserves the right at all times to disclose any information as FanLib deems necessary to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, legal process or governmental request, or to edit, refuse to post or to remove any information or materials, in whole or in part, in FanLib's sole discretion.

Umm, right. :/ Sure, I'm going to post stories there after agreeing that a bunch of corporate drones are allowed to edit them. No prob. [eyeroll]

You know, I get that there might be some horribly offensive whatver posted [cough] but it'd be more than adequate to reserve the right to "refuse to post or to remove" that material. There you go, that covers it. WTF is this "edit" thing coming from?

FanLib claims no ownership or control over Your Submissions.

(Except where we said above that we can edit them if we want to.)

However, by submitting the Submissions to FanLib, You hereby grant FanLib a non-exclusive, worldwide, and royalty-free license to use, reproduce, distribute, and display the Submissions in connection with the Website.

Sooo, if they decide some day to publish and sell an anthology of fanfiction "in connection with the Web site" then that's okay and they don't owe us any royalties? Check. [earnest nod]

I know what they're getting at here, but it could be interpreted in other ways as well and if it comes to a court case, they have a lot more lawyer money than I do, or than all of us together do. You'd think they'd have spent a tiny bit of that money to have a lawyer come up with a better, narrower way of wording this.

You shall be solely responsible for Your own Submissions and the consequences of posting or publishing them. In connection with Submissions, You affirm, represent, and/or warrant that You own or have the necessary rights or permissions, either from third parties, or through an ultimate determination of fair use under copyright law

So they're perfectly happy to sit there and rake in money from ad revenue but if some copyright holder who's not a part of their little cartel decides to sue, it's the author's ass hanging over the fire and FanLib will just shrug and point to the TOS. (No, really, we thought they had your permission! You mean they didn't??)

FanLib does not permit copyright infringing activities and infringement of intellectual property rights on its Website

Oh, please! Until there's been an actual court case, this is all up in the air and no one knows for sure whether or not fanfic is fair use. That being the case, this is just a lame attempt to weasel out of responsibility for setting up a service the purpose of which they know damn well is to host unauthorized stories based on copyrighted characters and settings and profit by it through ad revenue.

You understand and agree that cancellation is Your sole right and remedy with respect to any dispute with FanLib. This includes, but is not limited to, any dispute related to, or arising out of: (1) any term of the TOS or FanLib's enforcement or application thereof; (2) any policy or practice of FanLib, including the Website Privacy Policy, or FanLib's enforcement or application of these policies

Which means that if they turn around and sell your e-mail to spammers after all (for example) your "sole right and remedy" is to cancel your FanLib membership.

Violation of the TOS may subject the Member to international, federal, and/or state civil and/or criminal liability. FanLib will, where appropriate, attempt to refer actual or potential violations of laws to the proper authorities, and fully cooperate with authorities in the investigation of any suspected criminal or civil wrong. FanLib assumes no obligation to inform a Member in the event that the above-mentioned referral or cooperation has been provided and, in some cases, may be prohibited by law from providing such notice.

You know, this is probably just me being paranoid here but since the TOS prohibits any posting of material which violates someone else's copyright, they could in theory have set up this site to draw in as many fanfic writers as possible with the intention of turning around and smacking all of them for copyright violation, whether that means direct prosecution of people who are writing fics based on properties whose owners are represented on the FanLib board, or sending notification with names and e-mails and copies of stories to the copyright holders who are not associated with the site. I'm just saying.

We do not control the information provided by other Members which is made available through any Member's Account. You may have a risk of dealing with underage persons or people acting under false pretense. You understand that all information, data, text, software, music, sound, photographs, graphics, video, messages or other materials residing on the Website ("Content"), whether publicly posted or privately transmitted, are the sole responsibility of the person from which such Content originated. This means that You, and not FanLib are entirely responsible for any Submissions (defined below) that You post, email, upload, transmit or otherwise make available via Your Account. FanLib does not control the Content posted by Members on the Website and, as such, does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity, [==>]legality[<==] or quality of such Content.

[Bracketted additions mine.] Just underlining, with a thick black marker, that FanLib is not responsible for any material uploaded to the site which violates copyright.

The Website must not be used: (1) to store, publish, distribute, or otherwise disseminate unlawful material or information including, but not limited to: threatening, harassing, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, indecent, hateful, objectionable, tortuous, libelous, deceptive, or fraudulent information and materials

Heck, that lets out three-quarters of the fanfic on the net already. [eyeroll] And how can fiction be anything other than "fraudulent?" :/

[Continued from the section above] (6) in the furtherance of any activity, that infringes (directly or indirectly) upon the intellectual property or proprietary rights of others, including, but not limited to, copyrights, trademarks, service marks, trade secrets, and patents;

No, really, FanLib had No Idea At All that there was ANYTHING on their site which infringed upon anyone's intellectual property! I'm sure FanLib's lawyers are practicing their innocently aghast expressions of remorse as we speak.

You agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless FanLib, its parent corporation, officers, directors, employees and agents, from and against any and all claims, damages, obligations, losses, liabilities, costs or debt, and expenses (including but not limited to attorney's fees) arising from: (i) Your use of and access to the Website; (ii) Your violation of any term of these TOS; (iii) Your violation of any third party right, including without limitation any copyright, property, or privacy right; or (iv) any claim that one of Your Submissions caused damage to a third party. This defense and indemnification obligation will survive these TOS and Your use of the Website.

No, really! We mean it! If Joss Whedon or Christopher Tolkien or Anne Rice or anyone else sues your butt, you're on your own. And in fact, if they sue us over a story you posted here, you have to defend us too! [high-five!]

You agree that regardless of any statute or law to the contrary, any claim or cause of action arising out of or related to use of this site or services or the TOS must be filed by You within six (6) months after such claim or cause of action arose or be forever barred. Not withstanding anything else to the contrary in this TOS, FanLib shall always have and retain the right to pursue legal action of any kind or nature whatsoever in any appropriate jurisdiction in order to protect our interests.

In other words, sounds like if you have a dispute you have to sue them within six months or you're out of luck. They, on the other hand, can sue you whenever they want, up to and including forever.

The laws of the State of New York, excluding its conflicts-of-law rules, govern the TOS and Your Account.

Umm, wait, since when are people (companies, corporations, etc.) allowed to cherry-pick which laws in their jurisdiction do and don't apply? Anyone out there who can explain this? o_O

Also, there are a couple of mentions of their "fees," (VI.4, VIII) which sounds odd and even suspicious for a free service. Looks to me like they're planning to start charging some time in the foreseeable future and they figured, hey, why should we have to rewrite the TOS so soon?

Other people are talking about other reasons to avoid posting anything on FanLib.com (check out this [EDIT: she unlocked it so go read] by [info]stewardess and this by [info]telesilla just for starters) but to me that TOS is reason enough even if everything else looked just fine. If someone wants to "help us" bring fanfic to the masses and out from under the bush, that could be cool (whether or not it's a good idea in principle is a whole 'nother kettle of twinkies and beyond the scope of this discussion) but only if they're willing to stand with us and accept some of the responsibility in case everything goes pear-shaped, along with raking in the revenue. These people come across like a pack of weasels willing to make a few bucks off the fans for as long as the gravy train is rolling but who are all ready to sever the relationship if anything at all goes wrong. Heck, that "relationship" is already about ninety percent sawn through according to their TOS. It's perfectly clear -- they get the bucks and we get the lawsuits.

I don't think so. :/



Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(103 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]stewardess
2007-05-15 08:52 am UTC (link)
To sum up: "Anything that goes wrong is your problem. Also: we get to make money off you."

Good point about the possibility of anthologies and the like.

Most people will assume [I did] that You hereby grant FanLib a non-exclusive, worldwide, and royalty-free license to use, reproduce, distribute, and display the Submissions in connection with the Website applies only to online distribution, but it doesn't say that. The phrase "in connection with" may be intentionally misleading. According to this, they can reproduce and distribute fan productions royalty-free through any media channel, including print.

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]angiepen
2007-05-15 08:59 am UTC (link)
but it doesn't say that

Exactly. Heck, it might even be what they mean at this point but it's not what they're saying and there's nothing to guarantee that six months or a year from now, some bright young marketing weasel won't take a look at it and get this great idea for making some more buckage from the site. :/ That "in connection with" is far too slippery for my taste.

Angie

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]lobelia321, 2007-05-17 09:10 pm UTC (Expand)

[info]illuminated_sin
2007-05-15 10:39 am UTC (link)
Ugh. They're pixel pimps. :P

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]angiepen
2007-05-15 11:29 am UTC (link)
Seriously. They're willing to shine the public light on fanfic in the name of making money but fully intend to slide out of the way when the hammer comes down. :/

Angie

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]zillah975
2007-05-15 12:10 pm UTC (link)
It might be sort of entertaining to write fanfic of their TOS, and post that to the site. God knows their terms are a million horror stories waiting to happen.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]angiepen
2007-05-15 06:27 pm UTC (link)
Heh. Yeah, that could be kind of funny. ;D

Angie

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]katho, 2007-06-04 03:20 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]angiepen, 2007-06-04 03:26 am UTC (Expand)

[info]phantomminuet
2007-05-15 03:44 pm UTC (link)
stewardess had a good idea about protecting our names so I'm in the process of signing up for an account, just so no one else can grab "AngiePen" and post crap in my name.

I'm assuming that this is only for folks who write and post fanfic, correct?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]angiepen
2007-05-15 06:39 pm UTC (link)
Yes. [nod] It's a collection of "industry" people (entertainment lawyer, movie producer, ex-Yahoo executive, Silicon Valley venture capitalist) setting up a site to collect multi-fandom fics into an archive and make money from ad revenue. And I suspect they fully intend to start charging for access eventually as well, because of the "fee" mentions in their TOS. People like that (the lawyer guy is a Moonves for example) don't work for pennies and wouldn't be involved in this project if they didn't think there was major money to be made. And I guess it sounds good on paper -- there are tens or hundreds of thousands of fanfics already out there, which means that if they can convince the writers of even a decent fraction of those stories to archive with them, they can build up a collection of free (to them) product in hardly any time at all, which means they have a potentially ad-worthy sit much more quickly than if they were collecting original fiction.

And a lot of the issues I raised above wouldn't exist if they were looking for original fiction. But then writers of original fiction wouldn't be so ripe for exploitation, either. A lot of fanfic writers have a strong craving for "legitimacy" and this project can look like a step in that direction, the way it's being marketed. Since fanfic can't be published (except for official tie-in novels and handful of anthologies, but those are a very narrow slice of the spectrum) there's a lot of really excellent fiction out there waiting to be scooped up, if the writers can be convinced. Really excellent original fiction tends to be published and taken off the market. [wry smile]

What this is looking like is a case of some high-powered corporate types looking to make some money off of other people's fanfic, as fast as they can, before the hammer of the law (which the FanLib people might well bring down on us themselves, by making fanfic so publically visible and profiting significantly from it) takes away their source of free income.

Angie

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]alex_quine
2007-05-15 08:28 pm UTC (link)
I've been following the issue here and in Telesilla's posting. I think it's an ancient Chinese curse that says, "May you live in interesting times." Hmm. Many thanks for your TOS analysis. I'll be watching with...interest.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]angiepen
2007-05-15 08:31 pm UTC (link)
Yes, "interesting" is one way to think of it. :P

Angie

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]dejla
2007-05-16 12:00 am UTC (link)
All very good points. I went ahead and registered my name, but I did it to keep an eye on things... I really have no intention of posting fanfic there.

I don't expect fanfiction to ever be 'legitimate'. It's something that TPTB really can't and don't understand, because it's not meant to make money. It's meant to expand our enjoyment and share it.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]angiepen
2007-05-16 06:24 am UTC (link)
I won't be posting any stories there either. [nod] I just thought Stewardess's idea of locking my name was a good one. I haven't bothered at most of the archives where I don't post, but this one has the potential for relatively huge publicity, which means anything squirrely that happens will be that much worse.

I'm not completely against people making money from fanfic eventually, if the legalities could be worked out without anyone going to jail or having to pay huge fines or whatever. I don't see money as inherently tainting things or whatever the argument is there. Free is excellent of course, but I'd enjoy the really good fanfic just as much if it came with a reasonable fee and if that fee went (at least most of it) to the writers.

But it really chaps my ass when some high-powered corporate weasels decide to move in on our gig, and particularly when they're willing to accept all the profit they can squeeze out of it (without passing a dime of it back to the writers who produce the product they're marketing) but aren't willing to accept any of the responsibility. That's just slimy. [scowl]

Angie

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]copracat
2007-05-16 06:44 am UTC (link)
Dude, the masses can find fan fiction whenever they want. It's free, once you have a computer and an internet connection, and it's called Google.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]angiepen
2007-05-16 07:02 am UTC (link)
Sure, we all know that. [wry smile] What it looks like, though, is that they intend to bring fanfic to the people who watch the TV shows and see the movies and read the books but aren't yet aware that fanfic exists. Most people don't, after all. They're trying to become the CreationCon of fanfic -- bringing an inferior product to the masses for more money and raking in the profits, counting on the fact that most of their target audience doesn't know that there's a much cheaper (and in the cases of fanfic, free) and far superior fan-produced product readily available.

I mean, look -- they've got a Silicon Valley venture capitalist on their board. :/ They're not in this to just collect a bunch of fanfic and put it in one place for the convenience of fans who are already into fanfic. Because you're right -- it's free and we all know where to find it.

My guess is that right now, they're just assembling product. They're sending e-mail invitations to fic writers they can find -- through the message function at FF.net from what I've heard so far and probably other archives with similar capabilities -- and are offering T-shirts and whatever all else to get people to post stories on their site. We're not their target audience, though; we're their source of product.

Once they have enough fics, whatever target number they're going for, then they'll market like crazy to all the fans out there who've never heard of fanfic before, or maybe heard a mention here and there but never saw any or ever really bothered looking for it.

A lot of fanfic fans refer to themselves as "fandom," as though the people who write and read fanfic are fandom. The fanfic end of fandom is just a small part of the whole body of active fans, though, and active fans themselves (people who are into fic, or costuming, or go to and run conventions, or are members of media-based clubs, or collect pictures or autographs or props or other memorabilia, or produce or read non-fanfic zines, or any of a number of other fanac activities beyond just consuming the canon material) are just a small part of the whole body of people who watch the shows and movies and read the books and magazines. That last group, the larger group, is what they're after. It has to be because there's no way they could make enough money on this thing only targetting active fans, much less only people who are already fanfic fans, to interest the kind of people who are on their board.

They're after the audience for whom this is all brand new. The people who won't think it's weird to see "fanfic" in quotes like some brand new word someone made up yesterday.

We're just the field that grows the crops. They'll harvest all they can and then haul it to the megamart where the real money is.

Angie

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]cofax7, 2007-05-16 07:47 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]angiepen, 2007-05-16 08:28 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]cofax7, 2007-05-16 08:36 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]angiepen, 2007-05-16 08:43 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]ex_katiedamm852, 2007-05-17 03:12 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]angiepen, 2007-05-17 11:32 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]sayhello, 2007-05-19 11:13 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]angiepen, 2007-05-19 11:17 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]sayhello, 2007-05-20 01:16 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]angiepen, 2007-05-20 01:59 am UTC (Expand)

[info]angelofsnow
2007-05-16 08:20 am UTC (link)
I might be the only person in the world who always reads TOS agreements before I sign up for websites. (I'm paranoid, computer savvy, and I understand legalese.) I checked out FanLib last week and read there TOS. It might be the worst one I've ever seen. Did they actually use a lawyer to draft this? It sounded suspiciously vague and somewhat illegal. If it ever came to a Napster-type IP case I can't imagine this would hold up in court. Their defense against intellectual property rights, copyright, and DMCA violations is, if I read it correctly:

"In connection with Submissions, You affirm, represent, and/or warrant that You own or have the necessary rights or permissions, either from third parties, or through an ultimate determination of fair use under copyright law."

and

"FanLib does not control the Content posted by Members on the Website and, as such, does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity, [==>]legality[<==] or quality of such Content."

Wait, but they do control the content - they said above that they can edit it.

This whole company, FanLib, stinks of a profit-hungry, quasi-legal scam whose sole money making ability is spyware, spam mail, and doubleclick ads. Several months ago they sent mass mailings using a bot (rather spam like) to anyone with a FF.Net account.

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]stewardess
2007-05-16 09:09 am UTC (link)
Several months ago they sent mass mailings using a bot (rather spam like) to anyone with a FF.Net account.

Thank you! I had guessed that based on comments I read, and from what I know of fanfiction.net's workings. I'm glad to see it confirmed. FF.Net has a send message function, so you can email any member without knowing their actual email address. Kind of like myusername @ livejournal.com, in fact. ;)

Will they start spamming people who belong to the large fanfic comms at LJ? My goodness that would blow. But my hunch is LJ's email forwarding would catch that; it's pretty sophisticated.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]angiepen, 2007-05-16 10:38 am UTC (Expand)

[info]kyuuketsukirui
2007-05-16 09:00 am UTC (link)
stewardess had a good idea about protecting our names so I'm in the process of signing up for an account, just so no one else can grab "AngiePen" and post crap in my name.

Eh? I don't get this. There are thousands of fic archives out there. Do you sign up for all of them on the off chance that someone might take your username?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]angiepen
2007-05-16 10:49 am UTC (link)
Heh, no. :) Like I said above to [info]dejla I don't generally bother. But this has the potential for a huge amount of attention, from segments of the population which have never been aware of fanfic before and from people whose intellectual property is or might be being violated and from law enforcement. You don't get a big-name entertainment lawyer, and movie producer, and Silicon Valley venture capitalist, etc., involved in a business project unless there's the potential for making some very respectable piles of cash and the only way they can do that with FanLib is if they market the hell out of it, way beyond the current fanfic-fandom arena. I think there's an excellent chance that FanLib itself will precipitate that test case which gets mentioned whenever fanfic and copyrights and fair use are discussed, and whatever happens could be very much in the public eye, depending on what else the media has to occupy their attention at that point.

I've never worried that someone might "steal" my name for any malicious purpose, but there are a lot of Angies in fandom and the "Pen" could occur to anyone who writes. If this thing does blow up, particularly in a legal way, I don't want there to be any confusion about who is and isn't me, nor do I want to have to spend money hiring a lawyer to prove it.

And yeah, even if everything turns out OK, I'd rather there not be an AngiePen on what'll probably turn out to be an extremely high-profile archive posting crap with my name on it. :)

Angie

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]_midoriko_sama_, 2007-05-23 06:36 am UTC (Expand)

[info]doire
2007-05-16 10:11 am UTC (link)
Here from links from links at [info]metafandom.

It might just be a poor contract. Big lawyers don't automatically mean watertight contracts; where would the future legal fees come from in that case? :)

There seems to be at least one inconsistency
"FanLib reserves the right at all times to disclose any information as FanLib deems necessary to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, legal process or governmental request, or to edit,..."

"FanLib does not control the Content posted by Members on the Website and, as such, does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity, [==>]legality[<==] or quality of such Content."

where by claiming the right to edit they've implied control.

disclaimer: Generally reads English contracts.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]angiepen
2007-05-16 10:52 am UTC (link)
Hi! [wave]

There seems to be at least one inconsistency

Yep. Their whole TOS is just a pile of cover-your-ass crap. And yes, it's contradictory. [nodnod]

Angie

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]megselv
2007-05-16 10:34 am UTC (link)
Hi :)

I don't post fic, but I'm just as disturbed by this anyway.

Something that strikes me as unfortunate is the lack of disclaimers (etc) on the fic.
Maybe I (+others...?) could post a review on every single fic, advising the writer to edit her post to add a disclaimer, and suggest it goes something like this:

"Not written for profit, no infringement intended - any profit made by this site is has nothing to do with me."
-- And perhaps also recommend they take their fic and post on some (unspecified) non-commercial site in stead.

You seem to know this stuff and could perhaps suggest a more fancy wording?
I don't know, I imagine it could make *something* happen? heh.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]angiepen
2007-05-16 11:08 am UTC (link)
Hi! [wave]

any profit made by this site is has nothing to do with me

Aww, come on! They're getting T-shirts!!! [eyeroll]

And my first thought is that anyone who tried that sort of bulk warning to the writers there would be picked up on by the staff and thumped or outright banned for... I don't know, harassment or malicious sabotaging of business or whatever they could come up with. Certainly warning writers to take their fics and go elsewhere wouldn't be allowed to continue.

I would expect the staff to be tracking comment patterns -- primarily for marketing purposes, to gauge how the site is doing and help them monitor activity, popularity, marketability (I'm convinced current fanfic fans aren't their primary market, so they'll be watching for some signal to tell them when they're ready to start advertising to their target customers) and maybe to help ID their most productive (marketable) writers. They'd probably notice if someone or even several someones went around leaving a comment on every single story, or even one story per writer. Anyone doing it would be shut down before they got to any sizeable fraction of current FanLib writers.

Or maybe I'm giving the staff over there too much credit for competence, I don't know. :/ But I'm thinking that sort of a campaign would be shut down before it could achieve anything effective.

I imagine it could make *something* happen? heh.

Well, yes, most likely it would. [wry smile] I just don't know that it'd be something we'd want to have happen....

Angie

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]megselv, 2007-05-16 01:31 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]angiepen, 2007-05-16 01:40 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]megselv, 2007-05-16 03:21 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]megselv, 2007-05-16 04:35 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]angiepen, 2007-05-16 07:53 pm UTC (Expand)

[info]st_crispins
2007-05-16 11:54 am UTC (link)
One concern I have is that, like what's happening to YouTube, this might force a lawsuit. As we all know, there hasn't been one up to now because frankly, no one ---the pro folks or the fans ---want one.

And TPTB have looked the other way because little or no money was involved.

Setting up a website like this, even more aggressive than fanfic.net, might change that.

Reading the TOS and the comments, it appears they're trying to establish a textual equivalent to YouTube.

But YouTube provided a much needed service (a place for easy video sharing) and this does not. Also, YouTube is now in the middle of a fight by huge corporate interests with deep pockets for legal challenges. These folks are nowhere near that.

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]angiepen
2007-05-16 12:06 pm UTC (link)
I'm almost certain it will force a lawsuit. Unless FanLib crashes and burns before it really gets going, its existence as a high-profile, major-money-making concern is going to force that test case we've all be chatting about on and off for however long.

Maybe I'm just being overly cynical [shrug] but that's what it looks like to me.

Angie

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]melange1, 2007-05-16 03:31 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]angiepen, 2007-05-16 07:57 pm UTC (Expand)

[info]melange1
2007-05-16 03:30 pm UTC (link)
Oh, JFC. This is so not on.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]angiepen
2007-05-16 07:57 pm UTC (link)
Yeah. So much wrong with this it's not even funny. [nod]

Angie

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]geminilove_ca
2007-05-16 04:26 pm UTC (link)
I locked down my penname as well. It would be just my luck that some asshat would see my stuff, decide it *needs* a wider audience and set themselves up as me to post my work there.... then leave ME to clean up the crap.

Nope. Gonna try to avoid that as much as possible, thanks.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]angiepen
2007-05-16 07:59 pm UTC (link)
It would be just my luck that some asshat would see my stuff, decide it *needs* a wider audience and set themselves up as me to post my work there....

That's something I hadn't thought of, but no, I don't need that kind of "help" either. [wry smile]

And you're very welcome. :)

Angie

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]topaz_eyes
2007-05-16 04:53 pm UTC (link)
Here via [info]metafandom...

I decided to sign up, to hold my pseudonym so no one else co-opts it. What disturbs me very much, is that the signup page asks for your postal code. In Canada, a postal code tracks your residence down to a particular city block. (I imagine it must be similar in the US and other countries.) That's almost as good as an actual address. The people who do sign up, give up a significant part of their privacy right there. So, if/when the crap does hit the legal fan, in my mind it means that the writers can be tracked down easily enough. (I know e-mail addresses can be used, it's just that the postal code is much more specific.) I'm not sure now, if signing up to protect my pseudonym is such a good idea. Just saying. :-\

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]evaine
2007-05-16 05:27 pm UTC (link)
If you put in a valid postal code, not necessarily your own, it'll take it. In cases like these, I never use my real postal code, I use one from the city central far from where I actually live, or the postal code from where we lived when I was a child, many, many moons ago.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]topaz_eyes, 2007-05-16 05:48 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]evaine, 2007-05-16 05:57 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]angiepen, 2007-05-16 08:08 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]angiepen, 2007-05-16 08:02 pm UTC (Expand)
Zip Code & Marketing - [info]taverymate, 2007-05-17 07:13 am UTC (Expand)
Re: Zip Code & Marketing - [info]angiepen, 2007-05-17 11:41 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]perfica, 2007-05-20 03:54 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]angiepen, 2007-05-20 06:52 am UTC (Expand)

[info]peach1250
2007-05-16 05:02 pm UTC (link)
You know after taking to someone who works for photobucket and hearing what she said about parody law - I think everything we write pretty much falls under that, since we write so far off canon.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]angiepen
2007-05-16 08:13 pm UTC (link)
Some fanfic is parody and some isn't -- I've never thought that just being off canon makes something a parody. [ponder] Isn't part of the definition of a "parody" that the imitation be humorous, specifically? And I've gotten the impression that the legal protection for parody was based on the idea that it's social commentary or criticism of the thing being parodied, and that doesn't really apply to most fanfic either.

I'm not a lawyer, though, and have never even Mary-Sued myself as one :) so if you have some specific info about how parody law would apply to a broader range of fanfic I'd be very interested in hearing it.

Angie

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]blucola
2007-05-16 06:33 pm UTC (link)
My husband is always saying; "why did you click on that, did you even read it?"

I like how the TOS is worded to look as if they are being reasonable and cooperative with law enforcement, but it's just a huge weaselly swindle. You own nothing, not even your own work or the right or have your name (or the one you choose for the world to see) associated with the work you've written and posted. Isn't that part of the editing that they have given themselves permission to do?

I think I'd rather do what I've always done, choose places in smallish communities to share my stuff. I have zero interest in being a BNF. I mean, why else would anyone post in a place like that, unless it's to get even more feedback and recognition?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]angiepen
2007-05-16 08:21 pm UTC (link)
Yep, it's just a huge pile of weaseling and contradictions and ducking of responsibility. :/

I have zero interest in being a BNF. I mean, why else would anyone post in a place like that, unless it's to get even more feedback and recognition?

A lot of people do want that, though, and the idea of posting stories to such a high-profile site is going to be very attractive to them. Heck, I love getting comments on my stories as much as anyone -- I just don't let it shut down my brain. :P

And to be fair, why does any writer post their stories anywhere? If we were all in this just for the Pure Joy and Beauty of Creation then we'd just write our stories, enjoy the exercise of creativity in having done so, then file them in a drawer (or on a disk or wherever) and go on to the next one. The only reason for posting a story anywhere publicly accessible is because we want other people to read it, and there's nothing wrong with that. The only time it's a problem is when it leads someone to behave in an obnoxious or otherwise objectionable way in their quest for feedback and recognition [coughMsScribecough] or as in a case like this when it makes people act before they look or even think. [sigh]

Angie

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]blucola, 2007-05-16 08:40 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]angiepen, 2007-05-16 08:45 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]blucola, 2007-05-16 09:08 pm UTC (Expand)

[info]blucola
2007-05-16 06:35 pm UTC (link)
Oh and thank you for going through the TOS with such a fine tooth comb. :)

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]angiepen
2007-05-16 08:21 pm UTC (link)
Welcome. :)

Angie

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]calapine
2007-05-16 10:03 pm UTC (link)
I think, under my jurisdiction, agreement that contract would be set aside for Mad Terms. But, yes, America, I know nothing about, and that's one scary set of agreements.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]angiepen
2007-05-16 10:09 pm UTC (link)
Someone's definitely bullshitting here, yes, and hoping that it won't be noticed. [nod]

Angie

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]shrinetolust
2007-05-17 03:58 am UTC (link)
Argh. Thanks for contributing to this discussion. This is why the Internet pisses me off so much these days. You have to comb over every little detail of everything, and just when I feel some glimmer of hope in something--job-wise, writing-wise, etc.--it just turns out to be total scamville. *sigh* I realize people all want/need to make money but nobody seems to have a conscience anymore at all.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]angiepen
2007-05-17 11:47 am UTC (link)
It's very much a consumer-beware kind of situation, yeah. :/ And it's that much more annoying when the company trying to stab you in the back is all, "Oh, but we're fans too!!!" [eyeroll]

How's it going, hon? Haven't seen you around much lately. [hugz]

Angie

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]shrinetolust, 2007-05-17 05:28 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]angiepen, 2007-05-17 08:26 pm UTC (Expand)

[info]gillyp
2007-05-17 09:10 am UTC (link)
Interestingly, no post here from mimbo, aka Chris, aka 'one of the founders of FanLib' who has posted on my much less active discussion. How confusing...

His posts are here: http://gillyp.livejournal.com/77379.html?nc=25
if anyone wants to have their say (I would suggest posting on his/her journal, but it's empty)

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]stewardess
2007-05-17 09:33 am UTC (link)
There was a comment here from mimbo, but he appears to have deleted it.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]gillyp, 2007-05-17 09:45 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]angiepen, 2007-05-17 12:18 pm UTC (Expand)

[info]dunv_i
2007-05-17 10:47 am UTC (link)
I was reading the (impossible to find) FAQ and noticed something

(I'm paraphrasing, but) "Yes, we are for-profit. But this doesn't make us evil. Places like FF.net make money too."

First off, non-profit still make money. Just... differently (as in way too complex for me to try explain in even a critical essay - I tried in November. I failed.) It's still non-profit. Second, FF.net is known as the Pit of Voles. Thirdly, FF.net (I'm almost positive) makes their money off of ads, as in the ad companies pay them to post their unwanted ad across their site (and now FF.net has installed awful full page redirection ads which I really would love to burn). Isn't this different?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]angiepen
2007-05-17 12:35 pm UTC (link)
Yes, the difference is in what's done with the money. A non-profit can actually make a lot of profits -- they're just ploughed back into the endeavor. My understanding is that FF.net uses their ad money to pay for bandwidth and such, which is perfectly legitimate.

Non-profits are also allowed to compensate their staff, although if they go overboard there's likely to be a scandal eventually. Every now and then some large charity group (Red Cross, United Way, that sort) gets in the news for paying their executives too much money.

I'm also good with a company which is technically (legally and for tax purposes) a "for profit" company but which doesn't. An SF convention I used to work for was and still is a "for profit" corporation because at the time they incorporated it was cheaper for them to just pay the taxes than it was to do all the accounting and such required to get and maintain non-profit status. But no one's on salary and no stockholder has ever received or expected a dividend. They behave like a non-profit and that's good enough IMO.

Now, if Chris [points up to previous comment thread] could stand up and tell us with a straight typeface that only full-time employees are being compensated and not excessively, and that all company profits are being ploughed back into the business and no one will be getting any dividends, then I'll be more willing to listen to how they're all just fans like the rest of us, doing this for the benefit of fanfic writers and readers. [wry smile] That's not what it looks like, though, and all we have to go on is what they themselves have presented on their site, so if we're getting the wrong impression that's their own doing.

Angie

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]telesilla
2007-05-17 11:44 am UTC (link)
Angie, I see that Chris' comment to you got deleted. So far he hasn't deleted it in my LJ and if he does, I've got a screen cap. If you want to debate him, feel free to do it in my post.

I'm also taking the FAQ question by question and expressing my problems with it to see if he really does want a dialog or if he just wants to hide behind his kid and complain that the mean girls are harshing his capitalized squee. Once I post that, I'm going to open it up for debate and invite him to participate.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]angiepen
2007-05-17 12:37 pm UTC (link)
I was planning to go through the FAQ point by point too. [nod] I'll take a look at yours and see if I have anything to add. There sure looks to be enough crap in there for both of us, though. [wry smile]

I saw that he deleted his comment, by the way. I put it back for him. [points up a couple of threads, humming]

Angie

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]secondsilk
2007-05-17 12:17 pm UTC (link)
regardless of any statute or law to the contrary
Is that legal?

ff.net doesn't let people post things by authors who have said categorically "no fic." So if there was a site, however quality controlled and costing something, that would use members' fees to defend fanfic if it comes to a case.

I suppose the illegal might be meant to refer to stories which are illegal under child protection laws. But the ambiguity is, well, troubling.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]angiepen
2007-05-17 12:55 pm UTC (link)
No, to the best of my knowledge that's not legal, although if it is then hopefully someone who's actually a lawyer will come along and explain it. I don't think it's legal for a company to simply "declare" themselves unilaterally to be immune from a statue or law, though. [bemused smile] It's a nice try, I'll grant, but I don't see how it could work.

For that matter, it's not legal even if we the users agree to it, which technically we do when we agree to accept the TOS at the time of creating an account. At least, in some jurisdictions that's not legal -- the argument is that you can't legally sign away your legal rights. I think it varies from state to state.

About writers who've declared they don't want fanfic of their work, I'm not up on the list so I might be missing things, but the first one that comes to mind is Anne McCaffery and there's nothing in the fandom listing for the Pern series, under either "D" or "P." They do have categories set up for fandoms which currently have no stories posted, so my guess is that Pern was left off deliberately, which is good. I also didn't see any "Interview with a Vampire" stuff, and I know Rice is another one who's declared fanfic to be anathema. I don't know whether a fan would be able to upload a Pern or LeStat story and create a new category for it and I'm not going to try it [grin] but it looks like they're at least not encouraging fanfic if the copyright holder has tried to ban it. Credit where it's due, they're doing that right.

The TOS already prohibits underage sex and such. To me, the "illegal" seems to be just another reaffirmation that FanLib isn't responsible for any infringement of copyright or intellectual property. [shrug] They're hammering that one in with a piledriver. I doubt it'll help them if it actually comes to a lawsuit but they're trying their best to duck that particular responsibility.

Angie

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]snakey
2007-05-17 07:27 pm UTC (link)
"hateful, objectionable, tortuous, libelous"

I'm hoping they mean tortious. Either that or they have an unreasonable prejudice against convoluted fanfic. /picky lawyer.

Though judging by the standard of the rest of that TOS...sigh.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]angiepen
2007-05-17 08:29 pm UTC (link)
Are you actually a lawyer? I'd love to hear the opinion of someone who actually has that sort of training. I'm just a reasonably intelligent person who knows bullshit when she sees it but there were a few things that looked weird (like the "tortuous" thing) but I wasn't sure they were actually wrong. Any further thoughts?

Angie

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(103 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…